WL 712 Wetland Ecology and Management, Fall 2003, 3 cr.
Lecture: Tuesday & Thursday 11:00-11:50, NPB 102
Lab: Monday 12:00-2:50, NPB 181
Instructor: Dan Hubbard, NPB 139c Phone: 688-4780
Text: Lewis, W.M.,Jr. 2001. Wetlands explained: wetland science, policy, and politics in America. Oxford Univ. Press, New York, NY. 147pp. (and other readings as assigned)
Course Objectives: The course will provide the student with an understanding of the physical, chemical, and biological processes that occur within, around, and among wetlands, and how these processes relate to the management of wetland systems for wildlife and other wetland functions. Students will also become familiar with the diversity of wetland systems in nature. Classification and delineation of wetlands for inventory and jurisdictional purposes will also be studied. In the process of completing the course assignments, the student will become intimately familiar with the rather eclectic literature of wetland science and management. It is the goal of this course to produce a student that will be able to appreciate and read the variability of structure and function in wetland systems and to then interpret that information and apply it to the study or management of them.
Grading:
Points
Exam I 100
Exam II 100
Exam III 100
Term paper 300
Paper discussion 100
Paper lists 100
Class participation 200
Other assignments (?) ??
Total at least 1100
Grades will be assigned based on the following percentages of points earned:
> 90% = A
80 - 89% = B
70 - 79% = C
60 - 69% = D
< 59% = F
The grading of an individual piece of work (e.g., a test) may be curved if the class average is too low and then scores adjusted to fit the straight scale. The instructor reserves the right to make this judgment. The instructor will not raise the scale.
The General Course of this Course:
For the first few weeks, the instructor will lecture/lead discussions (sort of) on aspects of prairie wetlands ID and classification. Meanwhile, students will be perusing the literature (via their paper lists) and selecting their term paper topics. Next, we will read and discuss the text as well as the general functions of wetlands. In the last few weeks, the students will lead discussions on the papers I assign to them. Labs will meet for the first few weeks for field trips to local wetlands. The field trips will last until 5:00 pm on most dates. After the field trips are over (mid October) lab sessions will be used for guest lectures, videos, discussions, exams (you'll need the time!), etc.
Your Papers:
Each student will write a term paper. You may choose a wetland type or wetland system (e.g., southern bottomlands, mangrove swamps, Atlantic cedar swamps, boreal peatlands, Gulf coast salt marshes, etc.), or a function (e.g., nutrient biogeochemistry, floodwater abatement, ecology of a species or community interactions) or a management topic (e.g., influence of water level fluctuations/hydroperiod on bird use, creation of wetlands from scratch, use of the hydrogeomorphic approach to assessment, etc.). A separate handout will describe this more fully (format, style, etc.). You must have your paper topic approved by the instructor by September 30. The paper is due on November 11.
Paper Lists:
This assignment is designed to get you into the wetland literature and to help me assign discussion papers (see below) to each of you. All 5 of your lists are due by September 18. A separate handout will cover this in detail.
Paper Discussions:
During the last third of the semester, each student will lead a class discussion on a paper of interest to them (or, well, at least of interest to me!). These should be relatively recent papers that pertain to new information in the area of wetland science and/or management. I will assign a paper to each student. I will do this with input from the student. The paper lists will help me, but the papers may not all come from your lists. A separate handout will cover this in more detail.
Students with Disabilities:
If you are a student with a disability and need special accommodations in order to participate in this class, please inform the instructor and make appropriate arrangements with the Office of Disability Services (Room 110 West Hall, 688-4504).
Academic Dishonesty:
The Department policy on cheating is as follows:
Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences
Academic Dishonesty Policy
(Revised Nov. 2000)
The Department and the University have taken a strong and clear stand regarding academic dishonesty. We believe that it is unethical and unprofessional to present work done by others in a manner indicating that the student/s is/are presenting material as his/her original ideas or work; such activity is academic dishonesty. Plagiarizing or knowingly assisting others in plagiarizing on tests, quizzes, problems, assignments, research papers, theses, dissertations, or other academic activities is unacceptable behavior. All academic work completed by students is expected to be the original work of that individual student, unless permission is specifically granted beforehand by the faculty member for some form of team effort or other format. If students are unsure if a particular activity may be regarded as a form of academic dishonesty they should consult the faculty member before undertaking such an activity.
The University has a policy on academic honesty, procedures for academic grade and dishonesty appeals, and sanctions for such activities (see Student Code). The Student Code has different procedures for undergraduate and graduate students.
The Department policy described in this handout is intended to attempt to address perceived academic dishonesty violations between the faculty member/s and student/s before Student Code procedures are implemented. This is done because under Student Code procedures the minimum penalty for academic dishonesty is Disciplinary Probation. These added Department steps (Steps 1, 2, and 3 of the Undergraduate Student and Graduate Student Procedures) should not be construed as an attempt to circumvent the Student Code system; both students and/or the faculty member have the option to go directly into that system. The Department procedures portion of this policy are only available to a student one time; any second perceived offense will immediately follow the Student Code procedures.
Undergraduate Student Procedure
When a student/s is/are determined to have broken the Academic Dishonesty Policy, he/she will be notified verbally by the faculty member involved as to the problem and sanction selected. This is similar to procedures 02:02:01:03 and 02:02:01:04 in the Student Code. The faculty member will do this immediately after the perceived violation occurs. Sanction options available to the faculty member are as follows:
provide the student/s a grade of zero or some other score on the test, quiz, problem, assignment, or other academic endeavor involved;
provide the student/s a grade of "F" in the course;
request that the student/s withdraw from the course;
request that the student/s change the grading for the course to an "audit"; or
immediately refer the case to the Student Code procedures.
The sanction selected is at the discretion of the faculty member, based on the seriousness of the situation.
If the student/s agrees to the sanction proposed by the faculty member the process is completed.
If the student/s does not agree to the sanction proposed by the faculty member, he/she has the right to appeal the faculty member’s decision. This Informal Phase Appeal should be made directly (both verbally and in writing) to the faculty member involved within 5 class days of notification or within 7 calendar days of notification, if the incident is at the end of the semester. The faculty member may then modify or leave unchanged the sanction proposed in step 1. A copy of the student’s written appeal and the faculty member’s written response will be sent to the Department Head so that a confidential record to protect the student/s and the faculty member is established. The student/s written appeal and faculty member written response will be secured in the student’s file until graduation or he/she leaves the program; if no further perceived violations have occurred these materials will be purged from the student’s file.
If the student/s is/are still dissatisfied with the decision he/she can appeal to the Department Head. This Informal Phase Appeal should be made verbally. The Department Head will utilize this verbal appeal and the written student appeal and faculty written response described in step 3 to reach a decision. (These are steps 02:02:01:05, 02:02:01:06, and 02:02:01:07 in the Informal Phase Appeal process described in the Student Code).
If the student/s and faculty member agree with the Department Head’s decision, the process is completed. Up to this point, no one other than the student/s, faculty member, and Department Head has been made aware of the situation.
If the student/s or faculty member is/are dissatisfied with the Department Head’s decision they can enter the Formal Phase of the Student Code process (Student Code 02:02:02). It is the responsibility of the faculty member and student/s to be aware of the procedures and penalties involved.
Graduate Student Procedure
Same as Undergraduate Student Procedure step 1, except that the student’s advisor and/or Advisory Committee may be involved (see Student Code 02:05:01:02, 02:05:01:03, and 02:05:01:04).1
Same as Undergraduate Student Procedure step 2, except that the student’s advisor and/or Advisory Committee may be involved (see Student Code 02:05:01:02, 02:05:01:03, and 02:05:01:04).
Same as Undergraduate Student Procedure step 3, except that the student’s advisor and/or Advisory Committee may be involved (see Student Code 02:05:01:02, 02:05:01:03, and 02:05:01:04).
If the student/s is/are still dissatisfied with the decision he/she can verbally appeal to the Graduate Dean. (These are steps 02:05:01:05, 02:05:01:06, and 02:05:01:07 in the Informal Phase Appeal process described in the Student Code.)
If all agree on the proposed sanction at this point, the process is completed. Up to this point, no one other than the student/s, faculty member, Graduate Dean, and possibly the student’s advisor and Advisory Committee has been made aware of the situation.
If the student/s, faculty member, advisor, or Advisory Committee are dissatisfied with the Graduate Dean’s decision they can enter the Formal Phase (Student Code 02:05:02) of the Student Code process. It is the responsibility of the student/s, faculty member, and student’s advisor and Advisory Committee to be aware of the procedures and penalties involved.
1
The student’s advisor and/or Advisory Committee may be included because items other than class work could be involved.